which planet are you?

General chit chat and discussions here.
All are welcome!
Eretik
Posts: 1891
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Scotland

which planet are you?

Postby Eretik » Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:13 pm

Image
.:Pluto:.
"You are shrouded in mystery, which you love, but you have a lot of trouble expressing your feelings. You are very loyal and possessive, and you become jealous very easily. You have a great deal of courage and are very clear on what you want and how to get it. You are protective and will seek revenge on those who wrong you. You are also very clever and expect your lover to be attuned to your needs and wants."

Take this quiz!


Quizilla | Join | Make a Quiz | More Quizzes | Grab Code

[aphrodite]
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:40 pm
Gender: Female
Location: catterick garrison, North yorks, uk

Postby [aphrodite] » Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:57 am

Oh!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I must be the most hopeless person with a computer, I CAN'T GET IT TO WORK BOTHER :cry:

I have seen acouple of similar things you have posted so I'll try those. :oops:




Blessed be
Aphrodite
XXX

Sobek
Banned Member
Posts: 2112
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:36 am

Postby Sobek » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:21 am

its not just you, that site has been a total bastard recently. very hyperactive.

Sobek
Banned Member
Posts: 2112
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:36 am

Postby Sobek » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:26 am

Image
.:Venus:.
"You thrive on balance in all aspects of your life. You have a great deal of passion and when it comes to love, you like to play games. You have a tendency to search for something better, a search which always seems to come up short. You have difficulty finding satisfaction in life, but you have a great ability to get along with almost anyone."

Take this quiz!


Quizilla | Join | Make a Quiz | More Quizzes | Grab Code

ennui

Postby ennui » Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:39 pm

Image
.:the Moon:.
"You are known as the peacemaker of the group. You have a lot of patience and understanding of others. You hate to see pain and suffering in others. You love to nurture and help others, but you hide your own feelings in an effort to avoid conflict."




teh moon.
i didn't know the moon constituted as a planet?

Sobek
Banned Member
Posts: 2112
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:36 am

Postby Sobek » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:56 pm

"i didn't know the moon constituted as a planet?"

moons arent planets...they are moons lol.
i heard yesterday Pluto doesnt even class as a planet. needless to say, i was mortified.

Colubra
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:13 am
Gender: Female
Location: IL
Contact:

Postby Colubra » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:01 pm

Pluto will always be a planet in my mind!

And the moon is the moon but in traditional astrology it is a "planet" as is the sun. More like "influential celestial spheres" lol.

Sobek
Banned Member
Posts: 2112
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:36 am

Postby Sobek » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:08 pm

"Pluto will always be a planet in my mind!"

damn right it will!

ive never really associated moons and suns as planets with astrology, though i suppose it makes a certain kind of logical sense, but whether todays drop kicks class what as what they are still pretty influecial things.

those damn scientists piss me off...labelling everything is space when we can barely get anywhere out there.

Colubra
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:13 am
Gender: Female
Location: IL
Contact:

Postby Colubra » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:13 pm

"those damn scientists piss me off...labelling everything is space when we can barely get anywhere out there"

I know, and its usually even that they just give things stupid numbers.....bar coded stars! Blah!

Labels in general annoy me....they are limiting.

ennui

Postby ennui » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:39 pm

'influential celestial spheres,' haa. now that's more like it.
well i wouldn't go so far as to classify earth's moon as a planet (what about all the other moons?), but i'm with you two on the pluto front. call me set-in-my-ways, but it's meant to be a planet.. dwarf or not.

Elem
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:11 pm

Postby Elem » Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:03 am

Haha aw, poor Pluto, the odd little reject 'dwarf planet' sitting in an irregular, fluctuating orbit out on the edges of our solar system.

Technically, I believe it's a Kuiper Belt Object.. And the only reason it ever became a planet is because when it was first discovered, scientists widely over-exaggerated its dimensions. Technically, if we were to consider Pluto a real 'planet', then we would also have to consider several other objects within our Solar System as 'planets' too - in particular, Eris, which is located further away than Pluto.. But outsizes it by quite a large margin.

I believe that for a planet to be called a 'planet', it must:

- Be in orbit around the Sun
- Have sufficient mass such that its self-gravity has placed it in a state of equilibrium, creating an almost round shape
- Have cleared the area around its orbit

Pluto fails on account of its orbit intersecting that of Neptune.. Although I imagine the fact that one of its moons, Charon, is almost the same size as it doesn't really help, too (although this is an interesting fact in itself, for reasons I'll mention in a minute :P).

As such, it's been down-graded into being a 'dwarf planet', which follows essentially the same definition as a planet, except a dwarf has:

- Not cleared the area around its orbit, and
- Is not a satellite

As such, Pluto now takes its place amongst Ceres (in the asteroid belt), and Eris as a dwarf planet.. Although, several others may yet be added to this new classification, following further research. These include Pluto's largest moon, Charon, since it can be debated that Pluto and Charon are part of a binary planetary system, as opposed to Charon orbiting Pluto.. Since the point around which it orbits is not located within Pluto, rather, it is located at a common point between them.

Either way it would appear that, unfortunate as it may be for die-hard Pluto lovers, Pluto can no longer be considered to be a celestial body in the same sense as our 'major' planets. Sure, scientists are 'rewriting history' by changing its classification.. But, really, what does it matter? It's still there, and the fact that its classification has changed isn't suddenly going to throw a bunch of schoolchildren insane just because they learnt only last year that it was a planet :lol:.

*shrug* Things change as our understanding of the world / solar system / Universe around us evolve. We just gotta change with it, and realise that ultimately.. It doesn't really matter whether it's one or the other, eh? At the end of the day, it affects 99% of us in no way at all.. Unless you're an Astrophysicist haha.

Elem

brokenxdreams
Posts: 177
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:50 pm
Gender: Female

Postby brokenxdreams » Wed Jul 04, 2007 7:59 am

I don't get why they they don't have Pluto as a planet anymore, though. They've had it as a planet for years; why should they change that now?







Image
.:Mercury:.
"Your personality often has two sides. You have no trouble taking things in stride, but you like a peaceful balance in your life. You have a lot of creativity, especially when it comes to the written word. You are a great communicator and are very open to new ideas. You also have a strong desire to learn."

Take this quiz!


Quizilla | Join | Make a Quiz | More Quizzes | Grab Code

Elem
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:11 pm

Postby Elem » Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:28 am

They've had it as a planet for years; why should they change that now?
They can see further out than they used to, and look at objects with greater clarity than before.. Upon finding that there's larger objects out further than Pluto, which are similar to Pluto.. And upon final verification of The Kuiper Belt existing.. There was no way they could continue to allude to the fact that Pluto's the same kind of celestial body as the others we class as 'Planets'.

That's pretty much the crux of it :).

Elem

Sobek
Banned Member
Posts: 2112
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:36 am

Postby Sobek » Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:39 am

the thing i was reading after i discovered they dont class pluto as a planet was because it failed one of the criteria which was that it interferes with the orbit of another planet.

but you know, give em a hundred years and they'll decide the sun isnt really a sun for some stupid reason.

personally, i think we should take space at face values because we are never gonna know all the wonders to be able to classify everything.

Elem
Posts: 548
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:11 pm

Postby Elem » Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:16 am

personally, i think we should take space at face values because we are never gonna know all the wonders to be able to classify everything
I completely agree, all this huffing and fussing about whether it's a dwarf planet, a planet, a sub-planet or whatever is pure nonsense really.. And, ultimately, makes no difference at all. The only reason they bother trying to classify these things is because some areas of humanity are quite anal.

"Everything must have a name, a classification! What's more, it must be correct and up to date!", etc..

Whilst these anal scientific classifications mean little to nothing to most of us, they are still important.. Since it allows data to be stored in a neat, tidy and easily retrievable way, which is useful for scientific research purposes. Still, it is annoying that scientists have to slap a classification and name onto everything :lol:.

I once read a scientific definition of 'Love' once.. I'll try and find it later. Needless to say, it's eye-roll-worthy :).

Elem


Return to “For Everyone”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests