I searched for this topic to be sure i'm not uneccessarily creating a new topic about something that's already here. I don't think I am but i'm new so maybe I did and if so I apologize

So anyways, I've read a couple entries online from practitioners of traditional witchcraft and they are sort of infering that wicca's differences from their traditions are not exactly good things. Again, their opinion not mine. The common themes of these posting are in my words: 1. Gardner created wicca in the 1950's and wicca is not based on any "old" religions . 2. Gardner was sort of a dick? 3. Wicca is good for the current rebellious ex-christian because of the idea of the "one" being essentially monotheism and with the three-fold rede being similar to the idea of hell and unrealistic because you can't create 3x energy from 1. 4. Calling on a melting pot of gods and goddesses from different parts of history is disrespectful.
Okay, so all of these things were said...and I would site them except for this is my own interp but i'll find the sites if need be.
They say all of these thing but wherever i'm reading I can't find anything about Traditional, and just claiming wicca is "new agey" and "historically inaccrurate" and made for the "rebellious ex-christian"
Now maybe this has potential to get heated, that being said, I don't really have an opinion...I want the opinion of others here. What do YOU think?